Friday, October 18, 2013

How Fox Lies Masquerade as Journalism

A Guest Post

I happened to turn on the Hannity show on Fox News last Friday evening. “Average Americans are feeling the pain of Obamacare and the healthcare overhaul train wreck,” Hannity announced, “and six of them are here tonight to tell us their stories.”  Three married couples were neatly arranged in his studio, the wives seated and the men standing behind them, like game show contestants.
As Hannity called on each of them, the guests recounted their “Obamacare” horror stories: canceled policies, premium hikes, restrictions on the freedom to see a doctor of their choice, financial burdens upon their small businesses and so on.
“These are the stories that the media refuses to cover,” Hannity interjected.
But none of it smelled right to me. Nothing these folks were saying jibed with the basic facts of the Affordable Care Act as I understand them. I understand them fairly well; I have worked as a senior adviser to a governor and helped him deal with the new federal rules.
I tracked down Hannity’s guests, one by one, and did my own telephone interviews with them.
First I spoke with Paul Cox of Leicester, N.C.  He and his wife Michelle had lamented to Hannity that because of Obamacare, they can’t grow their construction business and they have kept their employees below a certain number of hours, so that they are part-timers.
Obamacare has no effect on businesses with 49 employees or less. But in our brief conversation on the phone, Paul revealed that he has only four employees. Why the cutback on his workforce? “Well,” he said, “I haven’t been forced to do so, it’s just that I’ve chosen to do so. I have to deal with increased costs.” What costs? And how, I asked him, is any of it due to Obamacare? There was a long pause, after which he said he’d call me back. He never did.
There is only one Obamacare requirement that applies to a company of this size: workers must be notified of the existence of the “” website, the insurance exchange. That’s all.
Next I called Allison Denijs.  She’d told Hannity that she pays over $13,000 a year in premiums. Like the other guests, she said she had recently gotten a letter from Blue Cross saying that her policy was being terminated and a new, ACA-compliant policy would take its place. She says this shows that Obama lied when he promised Americans that we could keep our existing policies.
Allison’s husband left his job a few years ago, one with benefits at a big company, to start his own business. Since then they’ve been buying insurance on the open market, and are now paying around $1,100 a month for a policy with a $2,500 deductible per family member, with hefty annual premium hikes.  One of their two children is not covered under the policy. She has a preexisting condition that would require purchasing additional coverage for $800 a month, which would bring the family’s grand total to $19,000 a year.
I asked Allison if she’d shopped on the exchange, to see what a plan might cost under the new law. She said she hadn’t done so because she’d heard the website was not working. Would she try it out when it’s up and running? Perhaps, she said. She told me she has long opposed Obamacare, and that the president should have focused on tort reform as a solution to bringing down the price of healthcare.
I tried an experiment and shopped on the exchange for Allison and Kurt. Assuming they don’t smoke and have a household income too high to be eligible for subsidies, I found that they would be able to get a plan for around $7,600, which would include coverage for their uninsured daughter. This would be about a 60 percent reduction from what they would have to pay on the pre-Obamacare market.
Allison also told me that the letter she received from Blue Cross said that in addition to the policy change for ACA compliance, in the new policy her physician network size might be reduced.  That’s something insurance companies do to save money, with or without Obamacare on the horizon, just as they raise premiums with or without Obamacare coming.
If Allison’s choice of doctor was denied her through Obamacare then, yes, she could have a claim that Obamacare has hurt her. But she’d also have thousands of dollars in her pocket that she didn’t have before.
Finally, I called Robbie and Tina Robison from Franklin, Tenn.  Robbie is self-employed as a Christian youth motivational speaker. (You can see his work here.) On Hannity, the couple said that they, too, were recently notified that their Blue Cross policy would be expiring for lack of ACA compliance. They told Hannity that the replacement plans Blue Cross was offering would come with a rate increase of 50 percent or even 75 percent, and that the new offerings would contain all sorts of benefits they don’t need, like maternity care, pediatric care, prenatal care and so forth.  Their kids are grown and moved out, so why should they be forced to pay extra for a health plan with superfluous features?
When I spoke to Robbie, he said he and Tina have been paying a little over $800 a month for their plan, about $10,000 a year. And the ACA-compliant policy will cost 50-75 percent more? They said this information was related to them by their insurance agent.
Had they shopped on the exchange yet, I asked? No, Tina said, nor would they. They oppose Obamacare and want nothing to do with it. Fair enough, but they should know that I found a plan for them for, at most, $3,700 a year, a 63 percent less than their current bill.  It might cover things that they don’t need, but so does every insurance policy.
It’s true that we don’t know for sure whether certain ills conservatives have warned about will occur once Obamacare is fully enacted. For example, will we truly have the same freedom to choose a physician that we have now? Will a surplus of insured patients require a scaling back (or “rationing,” as some call it) of provided healthcare services?  Will doctors be able to spend as much time with patients? These are all valid, unanswered questions. The problem is that people like Sean Hannity have decided to answer them now, without evidence. Or worse, with fake evidence.
I don’t doubt that these six individuals believe that Obamacare is a disaster; but none of them had even visited the insurance exchange. And some of them appear to have taken actions (Paul Cox, for example) based on a general pessimistic belief about Obamacare. He’s certainly entitled to do so, but Hannity is not entitled to point to Paul’s behavior as an “Obamacare train wreck story” and maintain any credibility that he might have as a journalist.
Strangely, the recent shutdown was based almost entirely on a small percentage of Congress’s belief that Obamacare, as Ted Cruz puts it, “is destroying America.”  Cruz has rarely given us an example of what he’s talking about.  That’s because the best he can do is what Hannity did—exploit people’s ignorance and falsely point to imaginary boogeymen.
Eric Stern lives in Helena, Montana. He was senior counsel to Brian Schweitzer, former Governor. This article appeared on the website SALON.


  1. Nice to know what was mentioned on web site Salon by 6 people. Looks like the Obama Administration spends more time in a SALOON! How ironic on the 1st day by HSS ‘war room’ information only 6 people signed up on the 1st day!
    There are many more examples of Obama Administration ‘transparency’
    1) Fast & Furious – ATF (under executive branch) supplied guns illegally to Mexican cartels. Only whistle-blowers have been penalized so far as far as we know.
    2) IRS – billions have been squandered (Lois Lerner could have been fired by President Obama, yet now she is drawing a lush retirement fund)
    3) Drone strikes – how many innocent civilians have been killed or injured?
    4) Gulf Oil Spill – we had the technology to deal with it. President Obama was delayed in action.
    5) Super-storm Sandy – Did President Obama not learn anything from Katrina or Gulf Oil Spill? How many people are still homeless?
    6) NSA – Why are we not asking where our money is and are they spying on us?
    7) Immigration Reform – why are immigrants being used as pawns for the Democratic Party 2012/2014/2016 elections? Why was AHA not designed with immigrants in mind if the Democratic Party truly cared for them?
    8) Racial Tension – Trevon Martin could have been my son. Really….sounds a little like what Bill Clinton would have said….but that might have been more believable. Why did he choose this one instance without knowing all the details of the case to react to it.
    9) AHA “you can keep your plan” – now we know in 2010 President Obama knew that was not true and it is in a federal document
    10) Arab Spring – How much money do we spend to support Islamic terrorism?
    11) George W. Bush running the debt up from $4 trillion to $9 trillion was ‘irresponsible’ according to then candidate for president Obama. Now the debt is $17 trillion (rose over $7 trillion in 5 years!)
    12) – How much does this cost us that many of us have tech savvy children that could have developed a better web site?
    13) Bengazi – We can find Osama Bin Laden, but we can not find who killed our fellow citizens? Are we protecting Hillary Clinton that knew the Libyan embassy was at risk? We now know there was a White House war room meeting the day before the attack.
    Why do we not ask for transparency for the Obama Administration the same as we did for Pres. George W. Bush in the ‘weapon of mass destruction’ investigation? Do we need to reassign the NSA and FBI to so they can investigate the Obama Administration?

  2. Saw Eric on MSNBC and he has his own iron in the fire complaining about being a left wing ideologue in a state where conservatives put the state in the national AHA registry, so his state was 'suffering' the same pain as the other 29 states on it.

    I find it amazing that Eric and MSNBC choose not to question the 'mis-statements' by our President. MSNBC appears to be more interested in Rand Paul's alleged plagiarism, yet they make only a token discussion of our President with multiple videos showing he blatantly did not tell the truth. In other words he repetitively lied and deceived Americans in order to pass the AHA!

    We had Richard Nixon resign before being impeached for involvement in Watergate and he deserved it.

    Bill Clinton was partially impeached which was stupid because all he did was stick his tally whacker around one of the many women that were not his wife.

    President Obama has not been factual about Benghazi, Obamacare, Fast & Furious, the national debt, etc. Our country seems to have been thrown under the bus with his mismanagement of 1/6 of the budget (healthcare). Is possible impeachment in his future? Maybe it is time to have him take an oath that he did not say, "You can keep your policy and your doctor.........period"

  3. Ah, but he told the truth when he said the best thing would be single-payer health care . . . before he sold out to the pharmaceutical industry and let the Repuglicans roll over him. What we wound up with is basically a Repuglican plan, don't forget.